The problem with environmental food policies that are blind to food inequality
To end world hunger, we’ll need to dramatically increase food production…right? Not so, says a group of researchers who have found that if we fight hunger by addressing food inequality, we’d only require a tiny 3% increase in global food production.
On the other hand, simply producing more food – often seen as the default response to ending hunger – would cause an unnecessary 20% surge in global production, leading to profound environmental damage, the researchers reveal.
DATE
September 20, 2019AUTHOR
Emma BryceSHARE WITH YOUR NETWORK
RELATED POSTS
Future Earth Experts Contribute to Two New Landmark IPBES Reports
Transformative Science and Global Engagement: Future Earth’s 2023-2024 Annual Report
[POSITION FILLED] Vacancy: Science Officer (France Hub)